Dog Bites Man – Again And Again


dog-attackWritten by:  Heather Clemenceau

I believe in an animal Bill of Rights, and I’m opposed to killing dogs based solely on their appearance, but none of that matters to the Pit bull Advocacy Movement. Dog bites have become one of the most emotionally charged issues that divide animal activists. For some time now, I’ve seen the Pitbull Advocacy Movement (PBAM) privileging the rights of dogs over the rights of human beings and their own pets. by accusing people who are skeptical about the aggression of fighting breeds of being “racists,” ”bigots,” and “breed bullies.”

I’ve had a special interest in this subject matter for a few years now. I’m a dog bite victim – the classic “dog bites man” story, In 2008 I was bitten by a molosser breed dog that I had known for two years. The owner was not irresponsible except in not informing me that the dog had bitten others before me. I was not playing rough with the dog, and the dog was leashed and visiting on my own property. So the hue and cry that only bad ownership or handling of a bully breed is the only possible explanation for a bite would seem to fall flat on its face.  My husband cried like a child – it was the first and only time I’d seen him cry.  This really scared me,  because I hadn’t yet looked in a mirror and had no idea what damage had been done.  The neighbour was crying.  I however,  refused to cry – I felt like someone had to keep it together.  My front teeth were loosened by the impact with the dog’s skull,  my top lip was ripped, and my nose was partially ripped off.  Bites to the face usually also result in a lot of blood loss,  due to the large number of blood vessels and capillaries located there. Later,  I developed two black eyes.  My neighbour cried whenever he saw me for weeks afterward.    Even the neighbour’s homeowner’s insurance company agreed that there’s little defensible when the bite is unprovoked, on the victim’s own property, involved a bite to the face that required plastic surgery, all by a dog that had an acknowledged history of biting people. As a result, the insurance company ruled that the doctrine of scienter applied in my case, and they paid me out for pain and suffering.

The scienter doctrine was developed as, and remains, a form of strict liability. If the conditions for scienter are found, the liability is absolute and does not depend upon proof of negligence.

bred to protect children

No – they were originally bred as dogs to hold animals for slaughter, and later as fighting dogs. There are no “nanny dogs, ” and young children shouldn’t be left in the care of dogs to begin with.  What I find  especially hypocritical about PBAMers is that they will proclaim pit bull types to be “Nanny Dogs,”  but if your child is bitten by the “Nanny Dog,”  they will be the first person to call you a “bad owner.”

Unfortunately, dogs have become a real enemy for the insurance industry. According to the Insurance Information Institute, dog bites accounted for more than one-third of all homeowners’ insurance liability claim dollars paid out in 2012, costing more than $489 million, with an average amount of $29,752 per claim. The Canada Safety Counsel estimates that about 460,000 Canadians are bitten by dogs each year. In addition, several recent high profile dog bite incidents have brought the issue to the forefront of insurers’ minds, with some insurers going so far as to refuse to underwrite insurance for homeowners with certain dog breeds. The PBAM evangelists I’ve encountered are far less concerned with dog bite victims and are more prone to screech “discrimination” when told of this latter finding with respect to their own insurance coverage.

The mandate of the PBAM evangelists has been to persuade the public that pit-bull phenotypes (for the purposes of this blog post – American pit bull terrier, American Staffordshire terrier, Staffordshire bull terrier, American bulldog and any other pure bred or mixed breed dog that is a combination of these dogs) are just like any other dog and any problems with temperament can be laid squarely at the feet of the owner. In order to push pit bulls into private homes, these evangelists rely on the average person’s general unfamiliarity with the heritability of dog behaviour. It is a fact that every breed of dog results from the human manipulation of inherited physical and behavioural traits, and all modern breeds of dog are what we have designed them to be via artificial selection. This blog post is not about presenting pit bulls and pit bull types as evil dogs to be destroyed at will – we know that statistically the vast majority of pit bull type dogs co-exist with people and other dogs without incident. Yet for a breed(s) that represents approximately 6% of the dog population, they commit anywhere from 70 – 90% of all dog bites. And many PBAM advocates consider these statistical truths to be nothing more than poopytalk by dog-haters. So, many of them are engaged in an all-out war to conceal information or hoodwink prospective adopters about these breeds of dog.


PBAM’s consistently implicate dog owners as solely responsible for their dog’s misbehaviour. While this is certainly often true, we know from understanding population and bite stats that this cannot be the sole reason for bites and fatal attacks. If pit bull types account for roughly 6% of the dog population while simultaneously committing 70-90% of dog bites (depending on various sources), then there must be another explanation beyond poor dog handling skills. It’s confusing when both professional dog handlers and casual owners recognize genetically predisposed dispositions such as chasing, catching pigs or cattle, killing escaping slaves, chasing foxes down holes, and guarding farm stock, but in the same breath they will tell you that every pit bull down at the shelter is harmless unless it has been raised wrong. To even suggest that a pit bull might come with a different genetic programming than a pointer or a setter is to be accused of “racism.” Which, I might add, is impossible since there are no “races” of dogs. Yet, people will acquire a hunting dog that was bred to kill rats and are then horrified when it displays its genetic legacy by killing a squirrel while off-leash. The dog merely exhibited a behaviour it was artificially selected to do, by man.

Just as we bred pointers to point, retrievers to retrieve, and sheepdogs to herd, we bred fighting dogs. Working bulldogs and terriers were used by butchers to hold and control animals for slaughter. The morphological characteristics of these breeds also meant that they were useful in bull and bear baiting. Dogs used for such activities have a physical conformation suited to the task – including large jaw muscles, necks and shoulders, and a body mass that makes defence against an attack much more difficult.

Naturally, we expect a breed to behave in certain ways because they were or are bred for specific purposes. In the case of selective breeding, the goal for any desired offspring are physical aptitude and inclination to engage in a behaviour. Sometimes conformation is an additional goal.

The inclination to chase prey is probably the aspect of the predation sequence that is most commonly exhibited across all dog species. The complete predation sequence consists of:

  • eye
  • stalk
  • chase
  • grab-bite
  • kill-bite
  • dissect
  • consume

Community dog problemSuch behaviours fall into the ethological category – modal action patterns (MAPS) and these are behaviours that are not learned but fully expressed in the presence of triggering stimulus such as a high-pitched squeal or a sudden movement. Such behaviours can be modified by learning, but they only require a trigger to be expressed. Breeders of hounds select for search behaviours, herding dog breeders want the stalk and chase, but usually not the grab-bite and certainly not the kill-bite and dissect. A dog’s motivation for hunting is separate from his motivation to eat. The fact that optimally raised dogs of any breed can attack suddenly and without prior warning is a testament to the “trigger.”

I strongly suspect that a great many breeders of pit bll type dogs are not breeding for appearance or quiet demeanor. There are many unscrupulous breeders who have bred the most aggressive of their dogs, so other behaviours have not been significantly randomized across the breed. Therefore, we have clustering of negative behaviours in pit bull type dogs. Dogs that are bred specifically for aggressive characteristics and for use in negative functions are abusive to the dog and a nuisance to the general public.

While dogs generally engage in “ritualized” forms of aggression when they come into conflict (growling and posturing but no real damage) when pit bulls fight they engage the grab-bite/kill-bite part of the predatory sequence with often fatal or near fatal results. There is seldom time to intervene to rescue the other dog (or human) before serious damage is done. It hardly helps that pit bulls are often the most abused dogs – they are often emaciated, chained, or forced to wear prong collars. Quite often they are intact. They are occasionally kept in multiples and are often active in breeding for the financial gain of their owners. Dogs maintained in this manner often do not exhibit the same level of sociability as dogs who regularly interact with humans on a daily basis. So there are often other risk factors involved.

The ASPCA describes the characteristics of a Fighting Dog:

  • Ignores signs of submission from other dogs
  • High level of endurance, agility, aggression towards other dogs
  • No warning prior to attack
  • Fight to the death
  • Gameness
  • High pain threshold

PBAM advocates SHOULD be cognizant of these variables, but if they are, they don’t let on. If love and training are all you need, and if aggression isn’t a heritable trait, why do we have such variation amongst breeds? Why is it that we can’t use just any large breed dog as a police dog,  or any dog as a guide dog?

Better examples of PBAM “logic” are rarely seen than in the Animal Farm Foundation’s “Best Practices” Manual for placing pit-bull type dogs. (The countervailing and more commonsense opinion on pit bulls in shelters, written by the ASPCA, can be found here. The ASPCA document acknowledges that the pit bull aka Staffordshire Bull Terrier is a relatively newer breed. As such, it has a much shorter history of being bred as pets).

Eschewing all common sense and reason, the AFF makes the following inflammatory statements:

“Avoid blanket restrictions, such as: No first time owners, breed experience required, fenced yard required, no renters, no adopters under 25”   Whatever could be wrong with adopting a pit bull out to someone without no prior dog experience and without a fenced backyard?

“Like dogs, children are individuals. Let parents decide what’s right for their children and what challenges they are comfortable taking on as a family.” These vapid idiots really do not understand that the whole point of public safety measures is to protect people from themselves.

Avoid blanket adoption policies, such as extra applications, mandatory dog training classes, background checks” Because you don’t care if gangbangers adopt pits so long as it gets them out the door…

If a dog is highly aroused or reactive in his kennel, hang a sheet or other barrier on his kennel door (high enough to block his view, but low enough for adopters to see in). Hang a cheerful sign on the cage that says “I’m friendly, just enjoying some privacy” And if a dog is highly aroused or reactive in his new home, it’s no longer your problem, because you’ve allowed the parents to decide that a highly aroused or reactive dog is somehow right for their children. Pit bulls do have the tools to inflict some serious damage. Plus it seems that most dog owners don’t sufficiently train their animals so everything goes along just fine until the house is full of people and the dog reaches an unnoticed stress threshold.

“Just recently, Nevada Humane decided to partner with NASCAR’s TJ Bell to promote “pit bull” dog adoptions” So the absolute worst person to get a pit bull can get another one.

Rather than focus on why a dog wound up at the shelter, their medical history, or what behaviors they need to work on, keep the information upbeat and focused on what the dogs enjoy doing with people. Disclose all known facts to the new owner, including information received from the previous owner” This second statement seems to be contradictory to the previous statement directly above.

There is not a single reportable appellate opinion in which an animal shelter was found liable for a bite by a dog that it did not own” So, transfer ownership of the dog fully to the new owner before it has a chance to bite anyone while under the care, custody, and control of the shelter.

Dolce and Gabbana

Dolce and Gabbana were two Chihuahuas up for adoption in New Mexico; despite over 900 Facebook shares, they were euthanized due to shelter overcrowding. They had never bitten anyone.

But there will soon be a verdict, if it has not already been rendered, against the Blount County Animal Shelter – accused of not advising a family of a dog’s bite history. The dog delivered life-threatening injuries to a young child. In addition to that case, recently, the Stamford Animal Shelter announced that shelter manager Laurie Hollywood had been fired for rehoming dogs with a bite history. Essentially, she did not do her due diligence in disclosing that history to the adopters. Perhaps she was focused on rebranding the image of pit bulls and the history of the dogs she placed was merely an untidy detail that she felt she could overlook. After a dog was surrendered upon having bitten a child, Hollywood adopted him out without disclosing the bite history. He then proceeded to bite the child in the adoptive family. Not once, but twice. In another incident with a different dog, the dog went on to bite the adopter’s wife. In all these cases, Hollywood did not take a bite report nor did she impound the dogs that attacked humans and other animals over several months.

Pit Bulls represented 32% of US shelter inventory in June 2014.

In another rebranding effort gone wrong, Second Chance Rescue minimized a pit bull’s aggressive traits before handing him over to a New Jersey man for adoption. The dog ended up attacking his two young children. The dog chomped down on his daughter’s leg and nearly tore his son’s nose off just ONE DAY after they brought him home. Seems like the Animal Farm Foundation’s “Best Practice” for allowing the parent to decide prudent exposure to dogs isn’t so great after all, especially when the dog’s history is concealed. As for having your nose almost ripped off, I know what it feels like, and I can hardly wish it on anyone, especially a child.

The rebranding of the breed continues to come at a cost to innocent people. As it gains momentum, it becomes obvious that there is an unhealthy obsession in trying to preserve truly aggressive dogs. Not only pit bulls, but other dogs – a German Shepherd with a demonstrated history of aggression, found himself in a North Carolina animal shelter and was scheduled to be euthanized. Although the dog bit a shelter employee twice, the shelter agreed to adopt him out to a local trainer. Sadly, less than two weeks later, in a public park, he seriously attacked the adopter and two other people before he was fatally shot by police.

pit bull bites

Glad a child lost his ear? I didn’t even want to conceal this person’s identity – their comments are THAT loathesome.

Cesar Millan wanted to save the mastiff cross-breed that killed Diane Whipple. Fortunately he was declined. He also wanted to work with the dog who attacked a small boy in Bakersfield, California. I can only assume that in Millan’s case that ego is the predominant driving force, since most people utilizing a scintilla of reason would probably concur that the most serious of dog attacks against people should result in humane euthanasia for the dog.

And why are aggressive dogs receiving so much attention from people who want to save them, when there are thousands of friendly – or at the very least safe and rehabilitatable dogs dying in shelters every day? I admire people’s dedication to animal issues, but these types of efforts seem so misplaced to me. Mickey is a pit bull mix who first killed a puppy, and then cracked a child’s jaw, eyesocket, and cheekbone, requiring the boy to have months of reconstructive surgery, Despite this, more people were concerned with saving the dog than helping the child. There were over 60,000 people pressuring the shelter for his release. Shelters may feel that they are saving lives, but if the dog kills another animal, there is no net gain in saved lives. If the shelter re-homes a dog that they strongly suspect is dangerous, then they are in effect saying that injury or death to other pets or people is preferable to humane euthanasia.

The epidemiology of dog bites is also widely critiqued by pit bull activists.

The most recent USA survey of dog bites conducted by CDC researchers concluded that in 2001, 2002 and 2003 there were 4.5 million American dog bite victims per year. 885,000 bites per year (all breeds) – almost one out of every 5 – are serious enough to require medical attention. Dog bites send nearly 368,000 victims to hospital emergency departments per year (1,008 per day).  In 2012, more than 27,000 people underwent reconstructive surgery as a result of being bitten by dogs. (Centers for Disease Control, quoting from American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2012 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report [online]. 2012. [cited 2013 Oct 24). In a study on Mortality, mauling, and maiming by vicious dogs, the authors state that: “…attacks by pit bulls are associated with higher morbidity rates, higher hospital charges, and a higher risk of death than are attacks by other breeds of dogs. Strict regulation of pit bulls may substantially reduce the US mortality rates related to dog bites.”

Most victims of dog bites are not intruders, but children or respectable adults. While most dog bites are not serious, pit bulls are disproportionately represented in serious mauling cases. A innocent child killed by pit bullsCDC report on dog-bite fatalities from 1978 to 1998 confirms that pit bulls are responsible for more deaths than any other breed (the CDC no longer collects breed-specific information). Merritt Clifton has also collated volumes of actuarial information on pit bull bites, and his findings reveal that attacks by pit bulls and their closest relatives still outnumber attacks by any other breed no matter how you spin the data. These are simple facts, and police, public, press, and politicians know it but PBAM elitists can’t or won’t accept statistics for pit bull damage. One of their primary defences is to claim that, unless a dog comes with pedigreed papers or is the known offspring of pedigreed dogs, it can’t possibly be assumed that all these stats reflect injuries by pit bull type dogs. They don’t want you to trust dog geneticists or dog behaviourists either. Definitely don’t trust newspapers.  Oh, and don’t even trust your own critical reasoning skills.

20 responses »

  1. Thank you for sharing this. I agree and have always thought that with any breed, you simply cannot get away from generations upon generations of breeding for certain characteristics. It’s why some dogs make great hunters and others don’t and why some make great therapy dogs or search and rescue dogs while others will never be able to be properly trained as such. I’m not saying that pit-bulls or any breed should be euthanized or cast out simply because of their breed — but glossing over the characteristics inherent to a particular breed is not doing anyone any favors, least of all the dog. And it always annoys me to no end to see a bite case or other aggressive case have an overwhelming wave of support of people coming out of the woodwork to adopt this one “misunderstood” dog when shelters are filled to the rafters every day with dogs who are friendly, have never done any harm and yet no one seeks to adopt THEM. When denied that one aggressive dog they want, I wonder how many of those “dog people” adopt one of the other needy dogs living right in the next cage? Not many I bet.

    • Thanks! I appreciate the sentiment. I’ve been told in the past that I “deserved” to be bitten, and for some time now I’ve ruminated about writing the post, as unpopular as it is likely to be. I also don’t promote the idea that pit bull types should be euthanized on sight, since the vast majority of them cause no problems. But the “blame the victim” culture has to end, and pit bull advocates have to face the stats objectively.

      • There are some estimates (including my own) that suggest approximately half of pit bulls will attack at some point. This is impossible to prove, but there is evidence enough for me to believe it’s true. When getting to know many pit bull owners in the past, I’ve learned that most will tell a story of serious aggression from their dog after they get to know you or have a few drinks. These are the same folks who weeks or months before said their pit is an angel.

  2. Excellent article. Pit bull advocacy is a sham. They don’t care about the dogs at all – just protecting breeders, dog fighters, exploiters, and abusers. PBAM needs to acknowledge the unique characteristics of the breed, teach adopters how to manage these traits, demand mandatory spay / neuter and put breeding of pit bulls into the hands of dedicated professionals, and set up these dogs for success. If they truly loved the breed they would protect it, not prostitute it!

  3. Thank you for this very well written account of the facts about this issue Heather. I am sending it on to a couple of people I know who believe that pit bulls are just misunderstood and none of them will ever bite a human if they are just loved enough.


  4. Excellent article!! It also makes one furious (as it should!). These dogs should NOT be in community neighborhoods. So sick of reading all the excuses from pro-pit people that pretty much sum up to an “Oh well” attitude at the expense of OUR children, loved ones, pets, and livestock.

  5. Great, informative, rational posting!! Yes, you will take a lot of heat from PBAs, but we can’t let that stop us from telling people the truth and trying to do something about the problem. Thank you 🙂

  6. Personally, I’m always wary of what I call ‘big, potentially dangerous dogs’. (could be more or less any big breed or mixes). I love all animals, and I don’t believe dogs are evil. However, even the kindest, sweetest dog in the world could bite if it gets stung by a bee or something similar. I’m not afraid of toy dogs, because if they do bite, it doesn’t do any harm. I guess what I want to say is that dog owners should care enough about their dogs that they take care to keep them tightly leashed and safe in other ways. It’s not the dog’s fault that it bites, but some dogs do bite.

  7. Well-written, with intelligent and often damning observations. These dogs are so very different from other dogs, and they are supposed to be that way. Extreme sport dogs with no more sport to engage in; no wonder they do the damage that they do. I particularly found the AF revelations and the section on predation sequences highly interesting; so many Pit owners and protectionists INSIST that Pit Bulls will give all due warning of an impending attack, when we know that this is not so. In your words, “while dogs generally engage in “ritualized” forms of aggression when they come into conflict (growling and posturing but no real damage) when pit bulls fight they engage the grab-bite/kill-bite part of the predatory sequence with often fatal or near fatal results. There is seldom time to intervene to rescue the other dog (or human) before serious damage is done.” Thank you for the time and effort expended on this article; very well worth it.

  8. Thanks for a well researched blog. The only commentary I can add is pit bull owners as a whole are not policing who gets them, how they are treated, when to euthanize for aggression, getting spay/neuter, or other responsible action to prevent attack, therefore, the public will never be safe as long as they coexist with us unawares.

      • The pit crowd seems immune to facts, even from their own side. ‘Bad Rap’, one of the most fanatical pit bull defence clubs, published a retraction of their nanny dog myth a year ago. Unfortunately, they only put it on Facebook, not on their web site:

        “It’s Dog Bite Prevention Week. Did you know that there was never such thing as a ‘Nanny’s Dog’? This term was a recent invention created to describe the myriad of vintage photos of children enjoying their family pit bulls. While the intention behind the term was innocent, using it may mislead parents into being careless with their children around their family dog – A recipe for dog bites!”

        Bad Rap is wrong, though. The term isn’t a recent invention. It was planted back in 1971 by pit bull type dog breeders who wanted to hide the real nature of the type, so as to sell more dogs:

  9. another sleazy ploy of the AFF is to persuade shelters and rescues to transfer ownership of dogs to relieve them of liability. remove the potential threat of liability and nothing stands in the way of placing poor misunderstand pibble in unsuspecting homes.

    excellent blog. you can’t shine enough light on jane berkey and company. thank you.

  10. The problem is that they have arguments for diametrically opposed propaganda, right?

    Either they are nanny dogs, which fuels the notion that they are completely harmless and may, in fact, be a reasonable babysitter for your kiddos, or, if that dog happens to maul that child, they screech about the irresponsibility of the owner for leaving the child unattended.

    Either the dog is not readily recognized as a pit bull and/or the “pit bull” is not a breed and therefore DBRF info is sketchy at best, or if that dog happens to do something good, there’s no QUESTION that the dog is a pit bull. Or if there’s a pit bull walk or some other awareness event, there’s no question which dogs are the bully breeds as their narcissistic owners gather in droves to parade their maulers around town.

    Either nurture will completely wipe clean the dog’s heritable temperament and will turn the bully breeds into uglier retrievers (enough love and goo goo eyes will do that, ya know), or the fighting nature of the dog has been culled from the breed and there’s no reason to worry about the prey drive and gameness of the breed.

    You CANNOT win an argument against the PBAM.

  11. Thankyou for this article. My next door neighbors, who rent , have a 2 yr. old pitbull. He is massively built, and unfortunetly intact. Their yard is not totally fenced, he has escaped several times, and has been in a fight with another pitbull who strayed into their yard. I have had serious conversations with them about neutering him and completing the fencing but to no avail. I did have more liberal views on these bully breeds, but your article has enlightened me.

  12. This isn’t an attack (although I’ve written a novel), so bear with me.

    You decree pit bull advocates (who have worked with animals who comprise of the “good” population) as evangelists. Then you state: statistically the vast majority of pit bull type dogs co-exist with people and other dogs without incident. “Yet for a breed(s) that represents approximately 6% of the dog population, they commit anywhere from 70 – 90% of all dog bites.”

    Please so a bit of research on Bully Breeds (XL, XXL, Pocket Pit Bulls).

    Via your post: CDC report on dog-bite fatalities from 1978 to 1998 confirms that pit bulls are responsible for more deaths than any other breed (the CDC no longer collects breed-specific information).

    New “variations” of “Pit Bulls” came into being in the 90’s. By 2000, it was a pandemic. People are willing to pay thousands of dollars for designer “pit bulls” who aren’t APBT, SBT, or AST.

    I own an American Pit Bull Terrier from the Ferguson’s Red line. She’s bred to pull and has no aggression issues (she’s three years old, therefore fully mature, and plays with our mice and hamster, children — she also adores frogs) who went through intensive obedience classes, socialization classes, and loves agility lessons.

    This — as per the topic of this blog — is my personal insight.

    There are numerous dogs who can fit the “physical” aspect assigned to the breed — which isn’t a breed at all but physicality — bulky, squared head, etc. However, any registered animal (AKC or UKC) will never weigh over (unless they are over-loved and fed) 60 pounds). The Staffordshire Bull Terrier will never weight over 40. And the American Staffordshire Terrier will never weight more than 85-88lbs.

    At the moment, papers are hung (actually, this happens more often than not nowadays). A good example? Hulk The “Pit Bull” (I’m only using that as slang for numerous animals who fit the “bill” due to characteristics). He is not any of the breeds mentioned above. He seems like a good animal, but he is not a “breed”. He is a dog that was created by those who want money and therefore breed more of the same for that very reason. There is another “breeder” who has “pocket pitties” that sell for over 3k each. They have kinked tails (a huge no-no) and do not conform to standards). This is why dogs who fit this description suffer so much. These people breed puppies during each heat (and are renowned for inbreeding) without a care in the world.

    In the end, humans are to blame for this crisis. I advocate for “bully” breeds but I’ll be the first to put down one if any aggression is shown. It’s awful and cuts like a knife but I have to spend time with solid animals who can be a part of a loving home. That is my job (well, it’s not my job, but I volunteer to foster because a dog is a dog — it’s up to me to do the testing and decide who passes and who doesn’t). I’d never place an unstable animal with anyone. I take the time to educate each owner on the energy level, grooming, and care required for every animal I care for.

    Not all “evangelists” are what you might think. Many of us work very hard to care for animals that would be dead otherwise. Each life saved is a bonus, which makes the time spent worthwhile. As for the numbers you list (attacks): numerous bites/attacks go non-reported. It’s unsettling but it’s true. I had numerous stitches on my face due to a Yorkie of all things. She got me good. But do I hate Yorkies? No. I’ve also been bitten by Shepherds, Labs, Goldens, Blue Heelers, Australian Shepherds, and a wolf-hybrid. I don’t blame any of them either. Each was in a bad situation, insecure, and had no training whatsoever.

    Ultimately, you are talking about a DOG. And while I don’t like the breeding I mentioned about, I do not condone all those animals to die. I’m simply stating the bite rates are probably due to such a thing, as well as owners who do not anticipate (or research) the animals they bring into their home.

    Wishing you all my best.

    • First off let me say that I’m glad to read that you have standards. I don’t actually despise any phenotype of dog, but I’ve had two very negative experiences with pit bull types. The people I interpret to be most responsible for the overbreeding, abuse, and yes, unrelenting promotion of pit bull types are those who continue to perpetuate the Nanny Dog myth and want to save an aggressive dog of any breed at any cost. Dogs who have killed or seriously hurt children have become celebrities. To me, this is a kind of sickness in society masquerading as compassion. Right now there is a petition circulating to rescue the Sharpei/Fila dog who attacked a Hamilton, Ontario man who later died. Although the pathologist has stated that he died of causes other than a dog bite, it would seem hard to deny that the dog was a proximate cause. And although the pathologist acknowledges that there are bite marks on the deceased man, the petition makes false claims about this and is presumptive about the cause of death (when in fact it has not been announced) in order to garner signatures.

      I’ve read bulletin boards in the Toronto area where pit bull owners arrange “dates” for their dogs. Advertisements often start……”my girl needs a boyfriend this week.” I’ve never seen any other breed advocates or dog owners meet in this fashion, with no standards for mating their dogs other that it be a pit bull (their words). BSL advocates don’t play any role in the overpopulation and occasional abuse of these dogs.

      The issue I have with any dog really is that as companion animals, we’re not asking a lot of them if we expect to be reasonably safe around them. We don’t make this claim about wild animals because they are untrained and undomesticated, so no one really blames them if they attack us. A dog that mauls or kills a human, another pet, or livestock isn’t really much of a companion animal, so I’m amazed that people want to adopt them at all. When a shelter is deciding whether to place a dog or euthanize it, they have to realize that they are charged with the responsibility of protecting people from themselves.

      BSL (in Ontario at least) doesn’t condemn dogs to death. I’ve never read of a single incident where a dog fitting the description of a pit bull was seized in this province. I’ve challenged people who claim otherwise but they’ve never responded with any proof. But we had a serious problem with the dogs, especially in Toronto, and we can’t claim that all the bitings and maulings were caused by gangbangers using the dogs for malicious purposes. Everyday people owned the dogs and somehow lost control of them or refused to muzzle them when the law required them to do so. The dog in this article is very likely to be illegal as well, unless it’s 10 years old and therefore grandfathered – – Toronto Police Shoot and Kill a Pit Bull……….

      I have done a lot of research on this subject. Witnessing an attack on a horse was the catalyst that started me on that path a long time ago, way before BSL came to Ontario. – Morbidity of pediatric dog bites: A case series at a level one pediatric trauma center – Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998. During 1997 and 1998, at least 27 people died of dog bite attacks – currently now the rates of fatal dog bites are much higher, with someone dying at the rate of about one every 7-10 days. – Fatal dog attacks, 1989-1994 – Dog bite-related fatalities: a 15 year review of Kentucky medical examiner cases,_Mauling,_and_Maiming_by_Vicious_Dogs.23.aspx – Mortality, Mauling, and Maiming by Vicious Dogs – Dog Bites in Urban Children – Dog Bites of the Head and Neck…. – Effectiveness of breed-specific legislation in decreasing the incidence of dog bite injury…. – Is that dog a pit bull? – Periorbital trauma from pit bull terrier attacks

      Thanks for taking the time to write.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s